I was going to start this blog post with a snappy run-down
of the history of the horse since the Bronze Age—skipping through Roman, Anglo
Saxon and medieval history with a click of the tongue and a crack of the whip.
But, as I’ve done a good deal of that already and it’s called
The Fell Pony and Countryside Museums,
I won’t. For which you should be jolly grateful, otherwise this post would have
been even longer.
However, I had better clear up a few technical terms here
which I’ll be using throughout:
Horse or stallion – an entire adult male with all his breeding
equipment intact, a bit touchy and difficult to handle if there is a nice mare
nearby.
Mare – an adult female.
Gelding – a male horse of age over 1 year, who has been castrated
to stop him breeding, and make him easier to handle.
Colt – young horse under the age of 4 years (in England, also, usually this refers
to a male).
Filly – young mare under the age of 4 years.
Foal – young horse under 1 year of age.
Hand – a term of immense age, the width of a man’s hand,
standardised as 4 inches. Horses are measured for height at the withers; when a
horse puts its head down to graze, the wither is the highest point of their
body, the bony part of the spine just above the shoulder. A horse of 12 hands
high measures 48 inches / 4 feet / 122 centimetres from ground to wither;
one that is
13.2 hands high measures 54 inches / 4 foot 6 inches / 137.2 cms; 15
hands high is 60 inches / 5 feet / 152.4 cms.
[i] And so on.
Time span
The horse has been around people for an awfully long time—since
circa 5,500 years ago, when they were domesticated in the
steppes of central Asia. Since then the horse
has developed an almost symbiotic relationship with humans and, like the dog,
cat, sheep and cow, has become a highly successful domestic species.
From the time of the Botai Culture of Kazakhstan, up to the advent of steam locomotion in Britain in the 1830s, the horse’s
job has been to supply power and/or speed.
Quality over quantity
Just as with cars in modern times, the more
power and speed you want, the more you have to pay for it. This means that the
most powerful people have the fastest and most powerful horses while the poor
old foot soldier and farmer has to make do with what he can get—or else, do
without. Historically, though, this doesn’t mean that the rich own very tall horses.
“... in the Iron Age, horses (or
more accurately ponies) averaged 12.1 hh in height and resembled the modern Exmoor breed in terms of overall build. Roman horses show
two distinct types; the first similar to the Iron Age ponies but taller (13.3
hh), the second taller still (14-15 hh) and more heavily built (much like a
modern cob). During the Saxon period there appears to be a change back to
predominantly smaller (13.2 hh) but quite robust ponies. In the Medieval period
the average horse appears very similar to Saxon ones, although a few relatively
large individuals begin to appear.”
[ii]
The horse found accompanying the Anglo-Saxon Lakenheath
burial (~570 AD) was about 14 hands high although the man is estimated to have
been six feet tall.
Most British “horses”, through many centuries, would be classed
as ponies by modern standards. Imagine a world where the horse population only included the current British native
pony breeds.
Kinds of horses
There were no distinct horse “breeds” until the late 18th
century; no pedigree societies and no stud books except the memories of the men
who handled horses as part of their employment.
Horses were classified by the work they were suitable for.
They were sumpters (pack horses); rouncies or cobs or nags who trotted
along carrying tradespeople (including the young squire struggling with his
master’s war stallion). Small horses did the work of all the industries, bore
messages, carried people on pilgrimages and transported packs of goods many
hundreds of miles from farm to consumer. A few horses drew farm carts harnessed
side by side in pairs or “at length” nose to tail but, given the often poor
state of the roads until the toll system was introduced, probably far more were
employed carrying packs and people on their backs. Pack horses from Kendal walked to London and back within a
month, taking wool, cheeses and other produce southwards and bringing back all
the dainties of civilised life from the capital to the rural communities.
Powerful and warlike men of course required war-horses.
These stallions were led by mounted squires to keep them fresh for a knight’s
use, hence the term
destrier, from
dextrarius, the “horse at the right
hand”. A war horse, even for an armoured man, was nowhere near as tall as the
modern Shire or Clydesdale draught horse; most likely he stood around 15 to 15
and a half hands at the shoulder and was a square-trotting powerful cob like
the “Powys Horse” of South Wales, or the modern Welsh Section D cob (before it
began to shoot skyward in modern times).
[iii]
Hobelars (mounted
local militia, used for skirmishing in times of war) rode hobbies of 13 to 14 hands high. Hobbies were quick and sturdy, like
Fell ponies, Connemaras, and the taller types of the New
Forest ponies. There is some discussion about whether they
trotted, as all British breeds now do, or paced or ambled; these “lateral”
gaits where the legs on each side move together were easier for a lady to “sit”
safely.
Gentlefolk, both men and women, rode
palfreys or
pads that
paced or ambled; the old term was
paraveredus
from which palfrey comes, as does the Regency word
prad. My Lady might be seated on a palfrey on a pillion pad behind her
older brother or husband, perched completely sideways; if she rode alone, she
would have both her feet on a planchette (footboard), and her palfrey perhaps led
by a servant—both positions that didn’t encourage independence. The side-saddle,
enabling ladies to control their mounts without a servant, developed from the
mid-16
th century onward.
[iv]
Under Henry VIII the owners of certain sizes of property had
to keep a given number of mares over 13 hands, for breeding—which strongly
suggests that English horses in a majority of cases were
under that height. Henry’s much cited edict required autumn drives
to round up the stock, within 15 days of Michaelmas, and any "unlikely
tits" or "unprofitable beastes" were then to be killed off.
These laws seem to have been widely disregarded, as in 1580 Queen Elizabeth had
to proclaim that to ensure the "breed and encrease of horses", in
future the penalties for non-compliance would actually be applied, and not
winked at as in previous times.
A
tit is a small or young horse, a term
dating from the 1500s or earlier, that developed, as many words do: 1726, “
Tit,
a little Horse, and some call a Horse of a middling Size a double Tit.”
[v]
The word persisted till at least the 1890s, with various meanings including a
girl, a young man, or a junior or weaker party of any kind, as well as its
remaining modern meanings of a bird or a female breast.
Around 1597 the term
Galloway appeared
[vi]
and quickly changed its meaning from a small Scottish horse to any short,
stout, quick general purpose animal—replacing the old “hobby horse” who is only
remembered now as a child’s wooden toy or a phrase dismissing obsessive
enthusiasm. Even as late as this they were still known as horses; the word
pony or “poney” for a smaller animal than
the Galloway didn’t appear until the mid 17
th century, probably from
French “poulenet”.
[vii] In any
case, you didn’t really need the word
pony
when you had the word
tit!
It isn’t until the 17
th century that pedigrees
begin to be found, primarily for what developed into the Thoroughbred
racehorse.
Horsey children are taught about the three foundation
stallions—the Darley Arabian, the Byerley Turk and the Godolphin Arabian—but
the original Thoroughbred coursers or
“running horses” were bred out of native British mares, using these Oriental
stallions as sires[viii]. Many of the racehorses competing under the patronage of Charles II
would have been only 13.2 hands high—a very long way short of modern racehorses
who are generally closer to 16 hands than 15. Every racehorse still carries the
mitochondrial DNA of those proud little British and Irish mares.[ix]
There were also local types of ponies and horses,
such as the north-country Chapman horses
which were stout, short-legged pack horses which travelling pedlars or “chapmen”
used; these were said to be the foundation of the tall Cleveland Bay and in
turn the Thoroughbred-cross Yorkshire coach horses, which were in demand for
fast coach travel because of their strength and the ease of matching them for
colour.[x]
Horses vs. Oxen in farming
Until the mid 18th
century, heavy ploughing was more often the job of oxen (bullocks) than of
horses. Rob Johnson, who has worked bullocks in Australia, tells me:
Bullocks are
stoic, and willing to please. A bullock team works on what it can graze, while
a horse team needs supplements like oats. Ploughing deeply in heavy clay would be
easier with bullocks’ slow, steady, cloven hooves, and bullocks tend to work
together more than horses. The early wooden ploughs would have been fairly
rudimentary as well. As the variables improved, like the ploughs requiring less
draught power, feed for horses being more freely available and harnesses
becoming better, then the quality of the farm horses was improved, and they
became better all round animals. They probably still wouldn't match bullocks
for the heavy going, but they were more versatile.
There were even ox-teams working in England up till the end of the 19th
century. Another point in favour of working farms with oxen was that when they
were no longer useful they could be eaten, whereas in England for millennia there has
been a taboo on eating horses.
Feeding
Horses belonging to land-owning
families seem to have been generally well looked-after. They were so useful
that they couldn’t be neglected! Stabled horses, then as now, needed to be fed corn (oats or occasionally barley) to
fuel them for hard work, and in the absence of their natural food, grass, or green meat as it has sometimes been
called, they must have generous quantities of hay to keep their digestive systems working; plus large amounts of
water, between 5 and 8 gallons a day. Not to mention straw for bedding!
Letters to Margaret Paston written in 1471
[xi]
tell us that her son, who had been detained away from his Norfolk home for some time, wished to make
sure that his horses were well fed, healthy and available for him to use when
he returned:
... I have now enough hay of my
own, and as for oats, Dollys will purvey (buy/provide)
for him, or I will pay whoever does so. And I beseech you that he have every
week three bushels of oats, and every day a penny worth of bread (probably horse-bread, made of beans).
And if Boton is not at Norwich
and Syme keeps him, I shall pay him well for his labour. Also that Philip
Loveday should put the other horse out to grass there as he and I agreed....
Colours
The Fenlands of East Anglia were drained by Dutch engineers
in the 17
th century
[xii],
and these engineers are said to have brought Friesian trotters with them. These
in turn influenced the Norfolk
trotter, and the Old English Black (later the Shire)—and the word “black”
brings me to the colours we might have seen among the horses of historic times.
Many of the horses described after the battle of Flodden in 1513 were grey; out of 252 horses, 95 were grey.
It was easily the most frequent colour of all, and “grey” did not include the
ones the accounting clerk recorded as “white”.
[xiii]
These horses belonged to the ordinary
Dales farmer-soldiers who were being “demobbed” after Henry VIII's Scottish
campaign.
The hair colours in another account, from the famous horse
sales at Appleby in Westmorland (1623 to 1646) ranged through a drabbish
rainbow from black, black bay, black brown, brown bay, red bay (with a “white
main”), bay, mouse brown, lead-coloured, roaned, and piebald (black-and-white,
coloured, pinto) to grey (not “white”
although a grey horse as it ages will look white).
It’s interesting that, in searching these Civil War period accounts,
I haven’t yet turned up an example of the term “chestnut.” The Oxford English
Dictionary cites it being used as a term for a horse colour in 1636 and Shakespeare
used it as a hair colour for people in 1600 in As You Like It, so it was in use in Southern
England some 50 years before these sales were being recorded. But the
alternative term “sorrel” is not in those Appleby accounts either. I wonder
what the red bay horse with the white mane looked like.
Over the centuries, increasing control of horse-breeding, by
gelding colts, allowed
less skilled people to handle horses safely.
It also exerted a selection process over which animals got to pass on their
qualities to subsequent generations. Some areas even spayed filly foals: I learned
from a university vet just today that speying mares had become so commonplace
in France that it had to be banned by Ordinance in 1717—and being a good
academic he even gave me the reference for it
[xiv].
Since the improvement of farming equipment
and harness, and the beginnings of selective breeding, draught horse breeds
such as the Shire, Clydesdale and Suffolk had
been used to plough and harvest, as well as to draw heavy waggons in the arable
counties of the east of Britain.
But the poorer the owner was, the rougher the horse, vanner, cob or pony he
would own, down to the local milk lady who might well be serving her produce
out of churns strapped either side of a donkey.
Once the railway age began in the 1830s the
need for relays of well-bred horses to draw mail coaches declined somewhat, but
they were still heavily used by private individuals who could afford to race, ride,
hunt, or drive. With the advent of the internal combustion engine in the 1890s
the horse began to escape his task of providing practical day-to-day power and
speed, and to be wanted mainly for the leisure uses we see today.
Here’s a little thought for you to go away
with: picture a farm horse coming home from ploughing. Of course the ploughman has
jumped up and hitched a ride to save his tired legs after mile after mile after
mile of single furrow ploughing. You might not realise, though, that he’s
riding sideways, like a medieval lady, rather than astride. Plough horses are
built for power and their backs are groin-achingly wide. I am reliably informed
from the Other Side of the Bed that without a saddle (or even with) there are
certain aspects of male physique that discourage men from riding astride. So
spare an admiring thought for the warriors of ancient times who spent so much
time on horseback and still came home from war to father a family!
[iii]
Hyland, A., The Horse in the Middle Ages
[xiii] DENT,
A & MACHIN-GOODALL, D, 1962: Foals of Epona (Galley Press) reprinted 1988
as A History of British Native Ponies (London:
J A Allen)
[xiv] Fleming, 1881 -
Veterinary Journal 12:145ff.
